One irksome thing in Living Biblically...
I finished The Year of Living Biblically last night. The second half was just as good as the first half. So, as I said, if anyone wants to borrow it (that is, after
zensister is done with it), let me know.
EDIT 11/19 11:00AM: After reading the various responses that this post has generated, I've decided that I was jumping to conclusions and judging too swiftly. I don't actually know what Mr. Jacobs may have done in the past to treat/deal with/mitigate his OCD, and my condemnation of his way of dealing with it in Living Biblically is therefore unjustified.
Mr. Jacobs, if you ever read this post*, please accept my apologies. I obviously had an imperfect (at best) understanding of what you are going through, and I judged you too harshly.
In the interests of full disclosure, I am not deleting the rest of this post, but I am "striking it out" so that people will understand that I recant it.
There is, however, one thing about the book that really bothered me. And it bothered me in two ways.
A.J. Jacobs has OCD (a disease which was made somewhat famous by Jack Nicholson in the movie As Good As It Gets). It doesn't appear to be crippling, but it does affect his life pretty strongly. Repeatedly over the course of this book, Jacobs mentions how pleased he is that the Biblical restrictions he is living under give him ready-made excuses for avoiding the kinds of situations his OCD hates (such as handshakes—germ-phobia is a very common manifestation of OCD, apparently) and engaging in the rituals his OCD demands (such as the repetition of certain activities, which he manages to partly satisfy by praying three times a day at scheduled intervals).
As I said, this bothers me for two reasons. The first is purely secular: OCD is a disease. It's a disease like chronic depression, attention deficit disorder, autism, etc.—a disease with a neurochemical basis and which can be treated.
He's not treating it. It's obvious from the way he talks about it that he doesn't feel any obligation whatsoever to treat it. Now, if he were single and living alone, that would be one thing. But he's married and has three children. If he's not treating his OCD, then he's acting out his OCD...and children learn by watching their parents! So even if his kids didn't inherit the neurochemical aspect of OCD, he's teaching them to behave like a person with OCD behaves.
(Now, to his credit, near the end of the book he does figure out a very important thing: he realizes that he can't shield his children from the world, that they will get hurt, bumped, scraped, even injured—and not only can he not be there to protect them all the time...he shouldn't be. His children, he realizes, have to be allowed to live, not just exist. This is a big lesson, and one that I hope sticks with him. At the very least, his wife will try to make sure it does.)
The second part about his OCD that bothers me is actually religious in nature: it really bothers me how happy he seems to be that his Biblical restrictions and commandments dovetail so well with the demands of his OCD. Why? Because, though I have little to no reverence for the rituals he is following, I still find it offensive that he is using a set of religious instructions to essentially make him feel okay about not dealing with his behavioral problems. It's using something sacred to justify something wrong. And, as mild an example as this is, it's still a kind of behavior that I find deplorable.
I'm sorry for going on so much about this, because the book truly is exceptional and enlightening, and I do recommend it. I was just having some trouble with this particular aspect of it, and I needed to get it off my chest. Please don't let my rant dissuade you from reading it.
-------
*This is not as inconceivable as it sounds. In the book, Jacobs says he has a habit of self-Googling, so it is entirely possible that he may stumble upon this post some day, and should that happen I want to reassure him that I've changed my mind.
EDIT 11/19 11:00AM: After reading the various responses that this post has generated, I've decided that I was jumping to conclusions and judging too swiftly. I don't actually know what Mr. Jacobs may have done in the past to treat/deal with/mitigate his OCD, and my condemnation of his way of dealing with it in Living Biblically is therefore unjustified.
Mr. Jacobs, if you ever read this post*, please accept my apologies. I obviously had an imperfect (at best) understanding of what you are going through, and I judged you too harshly.
In the interests of full disclosure, I am not deleting the rest of this post, but I am "striking it out" so that people will understand that I recant it.
A.J. Jacobs has OCD (a disease which was made somewhat famous by Jack Nicholson in the movie As Good As It Gets). It doesn't appear to be crippling, but it does affect his life pretty strongly. Repeatedly over the course of this book, Jacobs mentions how pleased he is that the Biblical restrictions he is living under give him ready-made excuses for avoiding the kinds of situations his OCD hates (such as handshakes—germ-phobia is a very common manifestation of OCD, apparently) and engaging in the rituals his OCD demands (such as the repetition of certain activities, which he manages to partly satisfy by praying three times a day at scheduled intervals).
As I said, this bothers me for two reasons. The first is purely secular: OCD is a disease. It's a disease like chronic depression, attention deficit disorder, autism, etc.—a disease with a neurochemical basis and which can be treated.
He's not treating it. It's obvious from the way he talks about it that he doesn't feel any obligation whatsoever to treat it. Now, if he were single and living alone, that would be one thing. But he's married and has three children. If he's not treating his OCD, then he's acting out his OCD...and children learn by watching their parents! So even if his kids didn't inherit the neurochemical aspect of OCD, he's teaching them to behave like a person with OCD behaves.
(Now, to his credit, near the end of the book he does figure out a very important thing: he realizes that he can't shield his children from the world, that they will get hurt, bumped, scraped, even injured—and not only can he not be there to protect them all the time...he shouldn't be. His children, he realizes, have to be allowed to live, not just exist. This is a big lesson, and one that I hope sticks with him. At the very least, his wife will try to make sure it does.)
The second part about his OCD that bothers me is actually religious in nature: it really bothers me how happy he seems to be that his Biblical restrictions and commandments dovetail so well with the demands of his OCD. Why? Because, though I have little to no reverence for the rituals he is following, I still find it offensive that he is using a set of religious instructions to essentially make him feel okay about not dealing with his behavioral problems. It's using something sacred to justify something wrong. And, as mild an example as this is, it's still a kind of behavior that I find deplorable.
I'm sorry for going on so much about this, because the book truly is exceptional and enlightening, and I do recommend it. I was just having some trouble with this particular aspect of it, and I needed to get it off my chest. Please don't let my rant dissuade you from reading it.
-------
*This is not as inconceivable as it sounds. In the book, Jacobs says he has a habit of self-Googling, so it is entirely possible that he may stumble upon this post some day, and should that happen I want to reassure him that I've changed my mind.
- Mood:
irritated
- Music:"Invite them in" by Allison Lonsdale


Comments
To me, this pretty much sums up one of the biggest problems with most (if not all) religions, people use them as excuses for bad behavior.
This is one of the things that I like about Buddhism—you don't see Buddhists doing that kind of shit nearly as much as in other religions.
I seem to recall from my Japanese history classes there was a high ranking Buddhist priest in the 11th or 12th century who was having an affair with the Emperor's mother in order to influence policy?
And militant Buddhist orders getting into fights and harassing civilians?
You once mentioned that you were confused as to what LJ comments set me off. Here's two of them.
1. "Religion is an excuse for people to do bad things." (yes, I do realize that was
As a Christian AND an RPGer AND a sci-fi fan, I've been on the receiving end of all of these type of stereotypes and they all are pretty hurtful. As a gamer and sci-fi fan yourself, may I suggest you consider your comments a bit more carefully?
2. "Christians lie/cheat/steal/are hypocrites. But this OTHER religion (insert here) is always nice."
Didn't we discuss this in an earlier blog?
Sorry. Your comments about OCD and religion are really interesting, and I want to spend some time discussing them as I have mild OCD yourself and some of your observations are really interesting. But I have to take a breath first and chill. Apologies to you and
In fact, your point about the Buddhist priest and the militant Buddhist orders only adds weight to it. Any religion can be used to justify bad behavior. I did not mean to imply that any given religion is only used that way. That is not only plainly ridiculous, it's hate speech! Please, please, please forgive me if I gave the impression that I think that way. I do not, as I hope I have been able to demonstrate in the past.
Additionally, I did not know about these evils perpetrated by Buddhists in the past. Of course, I could argue that if these people were doing these things, then they really weren't Buddhists at all, despite claiming to be—and you can just as easily and accurately make the argument that the people who use Christianity to justify war and other evils aren't truly Christians. And we would both be right.
Again, please forgive me for making it look like I was singling out Christianity. I realize it was an easy misinterpretation, and I should have chosen my words more carefully. I am sorry.
I in turn should clarify that the events I mentioned involved specific sects or individuals in Japan, and was definitely not a condemnation of Japanese Buddhism in general!
I appreciate you clarifying your intentions and apologize myself for any misunderstanding. I freely admit my "combat monster" reflexes you often joke about seem to manifest alot in online discussion! I must be careful not to become the Internet Devoid, lol. :)
P.S. Also posted some thoughts about OCD and religion based on my personal experiences below, I hope it is of interest to the discussion.
It is, however, good to get your input. It helps me get some perspective.
...Speaking from my own experience with OCD, it's not a clearly understood disorder, and apparently different people need different kinds of treatment in order to cope with it. In my case, OCD manifests as certain little "rituals" and "checks" that if I don't do them, cause me anxiety.
Now, in some of those cases, trying to constantly fulfill those checks aggravated the OCD to severe levels. However, I found that talking with a mental health counselor helped enormously. Simply telling someone about it, and receiving third-party reassurance that I wasn't the only one going through it, helped me avoid anxiety-reinforcing rituals. Which in turn reduced my OCD problems!
My initial response would be that using ritual behaviors would aggravate OCD, at least in my case...BUT, as someone mentioned, we don't know what kind of behaviors the author engaged in or what kind of advice he's had from a mental health professional.
I will say that my counselor mentioned that medication is not used to treat OCD in all cases, and in fact said she preferred not to, in my situation.
So it's probably not fair to automatically assume that he is simply doing a bad thing by prefering ritual prayer to medication. There's simply not a way to know that without more information.
I will say that I would recommend ANYONE with OCD symptoms, however, to talk to a qualified medical professional. Again, in my case, just talking was highly beneficial.
I still am over-zealous about checking if I lock my car, though.
And I think you're right. I'm judging too swiftly and too harshly, without giving the benefit of the doubt. After all, he may have talked about his OCD extensively in earlier books, and I wouldn't know it because I haven't read them. So in the absence of knowing, instead of assuming the worst, I should withhold judgment.
I think I'm going to edit the post now...
It IS very easy for a person with OCD to experience OCD-anxieties associated with religous practice (i.e., fearing irrational consequences if certain rituals or habits are not observed in worship). If one knows one has OCD, it is a very good idea to talk with a good (i.e. compassionate and medically well-informed) pastor or counselor to help sort OCD fears from actual spiritual issues.
I was very lucky in this regard, as my mental health counselor turned out to be a Christian (I didn't know this until after I started seeing her) and gave me good support on distinguishing OCD irrationality from genuine causes for concern.
But I imagine that, yeah, it would suck...
As far as understanding Evil...well, I don't think I have to understand the 'why' to be able to recognize the 'what' and then figure out the 'how'...as in, how do I fight it? That's the important part, in my opinion.
well...if hes tryin to build this life style...and praying 3 times a day works with it...whats thr problem?
Its like downsyndrom or autisum...there isn't a treatment, there isn't a magical pill. I think what he is doing is just as healthy as anything else.
so yeah, I believe that your premis about OCD is wrong, the rest of it I would agree with *IF* your premiss were correct
I don't know. So many folk have chimed in on this that I'm not sure what to think anymore...
I study Religion & Society at a major university. I am a religious scholar, so let me put on my academic hat for a moment. Religion is as old as humanity, and so are diseases like OCD. I have every reason to believe that religion has been used to treat emotional disorders. Drugs are a very recent technology. Ritual of any kind is a wonderful therapy. It calms and reassures the mind, provides an anchor when everything seems terrifyingly out of control. Ritual is my favorite therapy for myself. I don't take drugs of any kind, except for caffeine and an occasional Guinness.
Having said this, you bring up an excellent point about the children. Children learn what they see. They learn the skills of the parent, so if that parent is, in this case OCD, or, another example, alcoholic, then they grow up with OCD or alcoholic survival skills, which they try to use even if they are not OCD or alcoholic.
I don't have an answer for this, other than the kids should never be shielded from it. I grew up around brain damage. Consequently, I know how to deal with that better than anyone, which is a good thing, because my partner has brain damage from a serious car accident. That skill is useful. My parents were also alcoholics, so I have those skills too. Those skills are only useful if one is, in fact, alcoholic themselves.
Great post. You gave me much to think about.
I, myself, do take drugs daily for chronic depression. So I can understand the reluctance to be medicated, and I don't entirely blame him for choosing not to, if in fact he has chosen so. As I said, he doesn't mention it beyond the passages I talked about.
And, as I said in a comment above, so many folk have chimed in, with so many different perspectives, that I'm just not sure any more...
But, that is just me, and I realize that other people have different chemical makeups. What works for me may not work for you. We each do what we need to do to feel at peace.
By the bye, for some reason, this comment posted three times, so I'm just going to delete the two redundancies...
Wilhelm vF
I think he is just twisting the doctrine to interpret it for his
desiredisease.Sending happy thoughts your way.
Wilhelm vF